Wednesday, March 22, 2006

Conflict Diamonds: Africa's Hidden Pain


Nothing shines like a diamond, and probably nothing else in this world is the source of so much greed and misplaced suffering. To examine the whole issue of what has been happening with illegal diamonds is an eye-opening experience. Doug Farrah's book, "Blood from Stones: The Secret Financial Network of Terror," is a fascinating expose of the international criminals, moral degenerates and terrorists exploiting the illicit diamond trade in Africa.


Conflict Diamonds: Africa's Hidden Pain

The great reggae artist Peter Tosh was fond of saying, “I am from Africa. I stone you with diamonds. I stone you with gold...” Tosh loved these patois poetic references to Africa, and he was obssessed with the continent’s vast abundance of mineral wealth. In his song “Mama Africa,” he describes the Motherland as “the maker of diamonds, Mama, the maker of gold.” But beyond the profound natural forces that create the mysterious beauty of diamonds and gold are equally astounding transformations in the human world that create the massive demand and multi-billion dollar profits of the global gem industry. Diamonds are cherished worldwide as symbols of love, wealth, power, beauty, glamour and success. But behind all the shine and bling of "ghetto fabulous" rappers, traditional Hollywood glitz and the mass appeal of wedding bands, earrings and necklaces—lies the sad fact that over the years conditions in Africa have made buying diamonds a human rights issue.


South Africa – The Beginnings of a New Industry

Driving through Johannesburg, South Africa, one can’t help noticing heaps of artificial hills and small mountain ridges, layered with golden, yellow-hued dust. Along the main highways, or from downtown skyscrapers, a vast series of rolling plateaus—man-made mountains created by the debris of gold mines—can be seen stretching east to west, as the outer, visible signs of the world’s largest gold deposits. It soon becomes obvious to visitors that this ridge that encompasses Johannesburg, Pretoria and many outlying smaller cities fuels the giant economic engine of South Africa.

Some 250 kilometers to the southwest, in Kimberly, near the confluence of the Vaal and Orange Rivers, is the "Great Hole," another man-made oddity protruding from nature. With a circumference approximately one mile wide, and a depth of about 700 feet, the Great Hole was formed with the removal of more than 22 million tons of earth and stands as a monument to humanity’s hunger for the money to be made from mining diamonds. The gaping hole has a frightening and horrid presence; until it is seen, it is hard to imagine that something of this nature can actually exist, and it invokes archetypal fears of falling in pits or caves or being consumed in great darkness.

The gold reefs stretching around Johannesburg and the Great Hole are symbols of Western civilization’s contact with Africa’s hidden treasures. With frenzied fury, white miners, engineers, merchants and financiers began extracting diamonds in what became the Great Hole without any regard for the benefit of the land or its indigenous African people. As capital consolidated all the claims into the De Beers Mining Company, the kings of the new diamond industry experimented with a system of labor where Africans were confined to the most arduous, backbreaking work and were housed in sparse, prison-like dormitories called hostels. The hostel encampments allowed De Beers to maintain strict control of its African workers and created the foundation of the migrant labor populations—in both the diamond and gold industries—that eventually formed the financial backbone of apartheid.

Throughout the 20th century De Beers amassed billions in profits while paying its black workers pittance wages that were carefully calculated to a level just above the subsistence living conditions of rural African communities. With its gigantic surplus value De Beers formed itself into an unprecedented global diamond syndicate, controlling the production as well as the sale, pricing and distribution of diamonds worldwide. The shrewd capitalist elite at De Beers wielded powerful influence on the consumer demand side of the equation as well. The “A Diamond is Forever” advertising campaign—which De Beers started in 1938—is considered one of the most successful of all time. It created the notion that diamonds symbolize marital love and commitment (and thus never to be resold), and craftily identified diamonds as a luxury item synonymous with the glamour of celebrities, movie stars, royalty and high society.


The 1990’s: The Emergence of “Conflict Diamonds”

By the 1990s--just over a century since its inception--the De Beers diamond industry cartel remained more or less intact, controlling some 60 to 80 percent of the world diamond trade valued at more than $8 billion annually. After the freeing of Nelson Mandela and the dismantling of apartheid, the outcry over the plight of African diamond and gold miners in South Africa subsided and their oppression was more or less forgotten, or perhaps even legitimized—in all its racial ugliness and sad injustices—with the birth of the “New South Africa.” With the low-wage, hostel migrant labor systems firmly entrenched in South Africa, Namibia and Botswana—and with high consumer prices maintained at inflated levels by the De Beers cartel—the tradition of African exploitation by the diamond market forces morphed into new frontiers. As quickly as apartheid seemed to fall apart, various rebel groups, militia leaders and warlords across Africa suddenly discovered the military hardware, wealth and power that diamonds could bring them. In Angola, Sierra Leone, Liberia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, civil wars and regional conflicts were fomented by arms merchants who used the diamond trade to bankroll local armies while making fortunes through subterfuged networks of front companies and transnational corporations. The profits also filled the coffers of Al Qaeda, and possibly Hezbollah–terrorist organizations notorious for their violence and human rights abuses.

In Angola, the infamous UNITA rebel strongman Jonas Savimbi—who previously had been supported by the apartheid government—found in the trade of “conflict diamonds,” a new source of wealth to sustain his guerilla movement. Despite a negotiated peace settlement and years of UN economic, military and diplomatic sanctions, Savimbi and his UNITA forces were able to re-arm and resume the Angolan civil war based on the proceeds of diamond sales from UNITA-held territories. While the resumption of the Angolan civil war in 1998 first drew the attention of the United Nations Security Council to the issue of conflict diamonds, it was not until Savimbi, along with two of his senior brigadiers, was ambushed and murdered by government forces in February 2002 that UNITA was finally disbanded and its diamond trading activities ceased.

While Savimbi’s violent intimidation and megalomania was legendary—it seems the worst conflict diamond abuses occurred in Sierra Leone. The Revolutionary United Front (RUF), a rebel force headed by strongman Foday Sankoh, waged a civil war in Sierra Leone for 10 years by controlling the diamonds fields on Sierra Leone’s eastern region bordering Liberia. Unfortunately for the people of Sierra Leone, the diamonds there are of very high quality and can be found on the earth’s surface, accessible to anyone with a few basic hand tools. Much like Savimbi, Sankoh was brutal in suppressing anyone who opposed his rule; but Sankoh’s trademark tactic was to amputate the hands of locals to terrorize them into working the diamond fields. Amnesty International estimates that the RUF eventually mutilated about some 20,000 people, hacking off hands, arms and legs and otherwise maiming or butchering their victims with machetes and axes. Working in alliance with Liberian dictator Charles Taylor, Sankoh pushed his blood diamonds on to the world market, exchanging them for weapons and cash that sustained their political power. The RUF’s reign of terror finally came to an end in May 2000 when British and Guinean special forces intervened and crushed the rebel army. Sankoh was arrested and eventually died in captivity while being tried for war crimes, including crimes against humanity, rape, sexual slavery and extermination.

Conflict diamonds also created problems in the Democratic Republic of Congo, a nation that had finally witnessed a rebel movement overthrowing Mobuto Sese Seko, a dictator siezed power in a coup in 1965 and ruthlessly pillaged his country of billions of dollars. But shortly after coming to power in 1997, the new government of Laurent Kabila began to experience a wave of insurgency in its eastern regions. Once again, the same pattern evidenced in Angola and Sierra Leone emerged in DRC. The eastern diamond mining regions of the DRC were overwhelmed by rebel factions, primarily the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of the Congo, or FDLR, which were being supported by neighboring Uganda and Rwanda. The sale of diamonds from the FDLR on the international market provided resources for unending geopolitical conflict between various rebel factions, DRC and Uganda and Rwanda. Despite periodic negotiations and peace agreements, the fighting continues, resulting in the forced displacement of Congolese people living the mining areas, as well myriads of human rights abuses.


Global Activism and Global Action

During most of the Sierra Leone civil war, the international community was somewhat unaware of or indifferent to the atrocities committed by the RUF. Thanks to blistering international human rights campaigns by Amnesty International and Global Witness, public knowledge of the abuses increased, and grotesque pictures of amputated arms and hands threatened to tarnish idealized consumer images of diamonds as symbols of purified marital love. The Amnesty International and Global Witness “blood diamonds” campaigns, along with appeals by the United Nations, had a strong impact on the international diamond industry, which began discussions in 1999 on developing a regulatory framework to trace diamonds from their point of origin. Fuel to the fire was added by a November 2001 Washington Post investigative report by Doug Farrah linking $20 million in conflict diamonds sales to al Qaeda operatives as well as a Lebanese diamond dealer associated with Hezbollah. Farrah’s expose provided strong evidence demonstrating that al Qaeda was transforming its capital assets into hard-to-trace mineral commodities, particularly diamonds and tanzanite.

The industry negotiations culminated in the formation of the World Diamond Council, composed of representatives of diamond traders and diamond manufacturers and government observers, as well as the Kimberly Process, a new certification and paper identification process tracing rough diamonds to their place of origin. Established in November, 2002, the Kimberly Process requires diamond producing countries to provide a Kimberly Process Certificate verifying the origin of all rough diamonds mined within their borders; the certificates must also accompany the sale of diamonds at all subsequent export and import transfers. While the organizational structure and regulatory framework of the Kimberly Process is impressive, some NGOs have complained that the process is flawed as it relies too much on industry self-regulation and is susceptible to corruption at the government certification level. Nonetheless, the attempt at regulation of the massive diamond industry represents a step forward in stemming the dangerous trafficking of blood diamonds.

Sadly, diamond mining in Africa—and the massive profits of the diamond industry—have always been associated with the exploitation and hidden pain of African people. But with the most grevious abuses of the sales of conflict diamonds abating, and the diamond industry moving into a new era of regulation, at least some of Africa’s suffering is being reduced. Newlywed couples admiring the gleaming beauty of their wedding rings seldom give thought to the hapless miners who live and labor in horrible conditions so that comfortable Westerners can enjoy these “precious” gems. African Americans themselves rarely contemplate these connections, or the fact that the high demand and supposed “scarcity” of diamonds has been artificially manufactured by the De Beers cartel. Rappers flaunting their "bling" have unconsciously bought into the De Beers hype, propagating their egos on the twisted machinations of an elaborate profit-making scheme of distorted value.

Undoubtedly, human rights groups have changed the problem and perception of conflict diamonds, causing consumers to look beyond surface appearences into the some of the forces behind the mining and distribution of diamonds. Activists have forced more regulation, more conscience, more concern and compassion on the industry. Perhaps with time, people around the world will also learn to see more of the mystery and humanity of Africa itself in the magnificient reflection, brilliance and beauty of the Motherland's gemstones.

7 Comments:

At 12:38 PM, Blogger Empowerqueen said...

I don't think the pain is hidden, I think it is ignored.

Thanks for the blog,
Grace be with you ............

 
At 4:10 AM, Blogger Alli said...

Having had lived in an area of the DRC situated not far from the Zambian Border and in the crux of the trade in Shaba Province, now known as Katanga. It is as your previous poster has said. It is ignored not hidden. How can you hide 4 million people dying in the worst genocide of so far this and previous century? How do you ignore the starvation, rape of young girls and women last but not least.....How do you ignore the fact that many of these young rebel soldiers are of the same age if not younger than my son @ 13!
I could easily take you to various places and name you names in Southern Congo where the diamond trade, smuggling is STILL flourishing to this very day..And how mining corporations including those here in Canada are expoliting and working hand in hand with the devil taking away or forcing a lifestyle of abject povery in an area already ravaged by war and still ripe with rebel soldiers, still one of the poorest areas..
So is the pain hidden James? How can over 4 million deaths be hidden ? No it's in your face every single moment of each day and reminds me that my child does not have even one auntie uncle or cousin left in Zaire....Had we even gone to visit the chances of his being taken would be approx 97% Don't believe the lies that it has stopped!! I assure you it has NOT!!

 
At 3:46 PM, Blogger Island of Spice said...

Alli --

Those of us who have been wounded by the horrendous pain of Africa, have experienced overwhelming suffering. I, and my wife, and my son and stepson have personally, in our own way, been devastated by the agony and pain of South Africa. I can hardly begin to tell you how they have suffered, and how I have tried to love them through their suffering.

I never once said that the trade in conflict diamonds has stopped. I have written a very general overview of the issue of conflict diamonds in Africa, within a limit of 2,000 words as dictated by my editor. I stated specifically that the conflict diamond trade in eastern Congo continues.

Perhaps the title of the article should be "ignored" rather than "hidden." But I would also argue that the pain IS hidden by a modern media that is preoccupied with Brad Pitt, Angela Jolie and Jennifer Aniston and the like, rather than real humanitarian issues. The pain is hidden behind the wall of comfort that is the Western world, but it is plain to see among those who take the time to see.

My closing paragraph was meant to imply that activists bring light and exposure to the issue of diamonds. As I pointed out, diamonds have always been associated with pain and exploitation in Africa. I try to suggest a faint hope that activists will cause people to think more about Africa--its mystery and its humanity--when they think about diamonds, with time.

Peace to you, and your son, Alli, just as I wish peace on my son and his brother and his mother…

 
At 10:57 PM, Blogger Alli said...

never once said that the trade in conflict diamonds has stopped. I have written a very general overview of the issue of conflict diamonds in Africa, within a limit of 2,000 words as dictated by my editor. I stated specifically that the conflict diamond trade in eastern Congo continues.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

James I never meant to imply you had.. I was addressing you as first person as in engaging you conversation. I should have been clearer. Certainly you above all people would know that the conflict continues not only throughout the DRC but anywhere there are resources on the scale of diamonds and various other precious stones and minerals.

I do apologise if you thought otherwise. I was merely addressing you as a friend, not placing blame..Maybe it was the time I posted. It was quite early I woke up read your blog and responded...

We are doing fine thanks very much for asking...

 
At 3:25 PM, Blogger Island of Spice said...

Thank you, Alli, for your clarification. Your feedback and dialogue are definitely valued.

As a journalist one always tries to present an accurate and balanced view, one that is fair to both sides. For people like you who have been directly affected by the war in the Congo and the illicit diamond trade, the issues are more visceral, real and emotional.

I wrote this article with the intention of educating readers about conflict diamonds and the diamond industry in general. Sadly, Diamonds have always been associated with exploitation and suffering in Africa--it's just been a matter of degree and context. From what I've presented here one can conclude that the major instances of conflict diamonds have only ended (or will end, as in the Congo) with direct military intervention. Nonetheless, one still has to acknowledge the fact that--however imperfect--the diamond industry has started an important new era of regulation.

I think it all comes down to activists. People like you who have direct experience in the diamond conflict regions of Africa are critical to bringing light and exposure to these atrocities and awakening the conscience of the world. Activists need to continue to enlighten the world about events in Africa and the limitations of the Kimberly Process, thereby making issues salient and forcing the Kimberly Process to be refined and more effective over time.

And this brings us back to the question of whether Africa's pain from conflict diamonds is "hidden" or "ignored." It's actually both. However, I would argue that the pain is more hidden than ignored, because until activists expose the problem there is no awareness (in the Wesern world) as well as no action. But to say that the pain is hidden is NOT to say that it doesn't exist. People are suffering, but the view is obscured by superficial media, as well as media that tends to devalue information and news about Africa and the developing world.

 
At 4:09 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Only by destroying of the DeBeer company will Africa be free of the explotation that is forced upon it speople! Unfortunately, the world does not seem to care and especially the U.K. does not care. People from the U.K. plundered India and all of Africa and are stil allowed to do that! Unless other powerful countries will ban together to stop the U.K. nothing will change.

 
At 11:33 PM, Blogger Island of Spice said...

The history of De Beers is something else, and the exploitation that still continues to this day is shrouded now that apartheid has ended. Yes, Europe plundered Asia and Africa and built a system that created wealth for themselves through exploiting other cultures and regions. Unfortunately we can't go back and undo that history. I tend to see a lot of value in a socialist system that takes the wealth and power of the corporate world and redirects it toward the well-being of the whole society. I think African nations need to take a more active role in this kind of development, and not bow down to calls for "privatization." South Africa itself empowered their White Afrikaner population with "parastatals"--stated owned corporations that drove the economy and provided employment. Ironically, the old South African government showed that this kind of path to development can be very effective in dealing with poverty.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home